Skip to content
Free coverage check

See which of your coverage the engines actually cite. Before a campaign it is your baseline. After it, your proof.

Give us the client, up to 5 coverage URLs and, if you have them, your own prompts. We ask Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity - the same engines a free scan reads - and tell you piece by piece whether they cited that page, the publication it is on, or neither, plus which sites they are citing instead. Dated, stored and re-runnable, so the next reading is a comparison rather than another snapshot.

Step 1 of 2: the coverage

One URL per line, up to 5. We report on each one: whether the engines cited that page, or the publication, or neither.

A CSV of the URLs you placed. Any column will do; we find the links.

We read each piece and draft the rest for you to check: the brand, what they should be named for, and 5 prompts. Nothing is asked of the engines until you run it.

Free, and no email. The reading opens on its own link, which keeps working - so you can send it on or come back to it.

These are the 5 we ask by default

Built from the brand and what you want the client referenced for, not from your headlines. Supply your own 5 instead if you track a prompt set already - either way the wording is frozen onto the reading, so the same questions can be asked again after the campaign and the two compared.

Identity
what does [Client brand] do
The description everything else is judged against.
Capability
does [Client brand] offer [the thing you announced]
Whether the announcement has reached the answer at all.
Category
who offers [the thing you announced] for [segment]
The buying question. Coverage that wins this one is worth repeating.
Comparison
[Client brand] vs alternatives for [the thing you announced]
Where a competitor comparison page usually speaks for you.
News
what has [Client brand] announced recently
Weakest of the five. Engines hedge on recency and may answer from memory rather than a source.

4 engines, 5 questions, 20 answers. Every source kept.

Three things it tells you

All three are readable today, from what is published. None of them needs a tag on the client's site, and none of them claims the campaign caused anything.

Recognition
Do the engines know who the brand is

Ask about the brand by name and see whether the answer is right, wrong, or about somebody else. Confusion with a similarly named company is more common than you would think, and it is invisible until you look.

Evidence
Is your coverage the source, or is a competitor

Every AI answer is assembled from pages. Each URL you give us gets a row: cited as a page, cited as a publication but a different page on it, or not cited at all. Two of four being a competitor comparison page is a finding.

A starting line
Something to measure the next campaign against

The reading is dated and stored with its questions, so the same ones can be asked again after the campaign. Without that first reading there is nothing to compare, which is why this one is free - one per client domain.

Built for PR teams who are tired of reporting reach. See how agencies use it